Thursday, December 29, 2005

A Side Rant

I won’t do this too often here, but every now and then there’s going to be something that needs to be said. Here it is: The next person I see link some newbie poster the two articles on Fantasy Heartbreaker is going to get one angry PM from me. I am sick and tired of people using those two articles as a club to beat some poor guy who’s just looking for some feedback and a place to belong. Enough already!

Time and Time and Time and Time again I see people ON THEIR FIRST POST in the thread link them the Fantasy Heartbreaker articles. And half the time (maybe more) it’s linked by people who have never written, let alone published an RPG. Who are you to decide who is worthy to write a game and who isn’t? It’s like swatting down some poor kid’s dream before he even has a chance to see if it will fly. Linking those articles to a newbie poster isn’t feedback folks, it’s bullying. That’s right, you’re a bully.

Not once in those articles did Ron ever say they didn’t have a right to be published. Never did he say that those games aren’t fun to play. And he certainly never established a pattern on whacking someone over the head with them to keep him or her from designing their game!

And more than anything, people who typically link them forget about one of the most important components of a Fantasy Heartbreaker: Publishing. Here’s a quote from the first article: “And considering when most were published, before most printers changed their policies regarding small print runs, print costs must have been enormous, in the $6000-plus category for standard paperbacks. Some of the games contain cardstock inserts, too. Vanity is vanity, sure, but we are not talking about small sums. …they are not selling direct to end-users, they are selling to the tiers. A limited presence in stores via "slush-fund" ordering is the best they can hope for, meaning no in-store sales or even recognition of their presence. And even if they get to end-users, their aggressively retro mode of play and presentation cannot compete with those games which defined that mode of play and command the loyalty of those who value it. In terms of the tiers, these games are what define small press: imitative game design, low-budget presentation, and minimal customer interest. To the retailer of the 1990s, such a game is not re-ordered, even if it sells.”

Now, can you honestly tell me that from the first post the newbie makes you can say whether or not they plan to sink thousands of dollars into publishing the game to sell to distributors and not end users? Can you assure me that their publishing plans aren’t just to turn it into a pdf and sell it on Drivethru RPG? I doubt it.

So instead of bullying someone out of writing a game, dig deeper. Ask them pointed questions that might lead them to A) changing the style of their game or B) keep them from sinking large amounts of cash into it. But don’t tell them that their game sucks! Don’t tell them they’re automatically a Heartbreaker because they said the word “fantasy” in their post. Step up to the table and give them a real feedback post that will help them improve their design. Linking articles on the Forge in your first post in the thread is a coward’s way to feedback.

On your third of fourth post of trying to help this guy, then maybe it would be time to link it and be done with him. But only after you give your best effort to help them improve their design and they just don’t seem to understand or care about what you’re trying to get at. But every time I see those links in someone’s first post, I get irate.

Peace,

-Troy
For further reading along these lines, check out this article by Joshua BishopRoby.

8 comments:

Joshua BishopRoby said...

It's sort of a pervasive Forge issue -- we seek to understand the hobby, so we classify it; different classifications accrue connotations of value and quality -- originally and properly in specific contexts, such as "this thing is good for that goal," but the qualification eventually gets lost -- and then the assumed value and quality standards of specific classifications are applied across the board. Usually, as you point out, by the guys who haven't completed a design and haven't published, the guys who have been at the Forge only a couple months, but sadly not always. Fantasy Heartbreakers become second-class citizens of the RPG world, and "Narrativist" games are lauded as the apogee in design.

Unfortunately, it's not really a situation that is resolvable, I think. This is an uncomfortable stage in the learning process, where the student must incorrectly apply new concepts in order to understand where they don't apply. The fact that we do all our learning out in the open at the Forge means that we're constantly publicly misapplying concepts in our quest to learn to apply them correctly. Maybe the Intro to Big Model forum will help with this, but it certainly won't end the problem completely.

Troy_Costisick said...

Heya

This is an uncomfortable stage in the learning process, where the student must incorrectly apply new concepts in order to understand where they don't apply. The fact that we do all our learning out in the open at the Forge means that we're constantly publicly misapplying concepts in our quest to learn to apply them correctly

You have a good point here, Josh. I know I've made my share of public mistakes on The Forge. Still do in fact. Taking it to PM's is probably the best way to handle situations like the one I described.

Thanks for dropping by :)

Peace,

-Troy

Keanu Smith said...

This is a nice post shared here. Great article and thanks for sharing this post.

buy kamagra

Emma jacob said...

You got a really useful blog. I have been here reading for about an hour. I am a newbie and your success is very much an inspiration for me.
Natural minerals

saim said...

This is a great inspiring article.I am pretty much pleased with your good work.You put really very helpful information.


find doctor list

ali khan said...

I’ve discovered an incredible deal of very fantastic content material on your net web-site. I’ll undoubtedly be back once more for lots far more.advertising | advertisment | production houses in pakistan | pakistani matrimony

Best Article Websites said...


Very significant article for us , I think the representation of this article is actually superbly one. This is my first visit to your site.
Advertising agencies in UK | Mobile apps for university

JAMES DEAN said...

I will be really glad my spouse and I witnessed an excellent website. I am providing an online cricket channel. The person who created this post was a big thank you man for sharing with us.
live espn | live match streaming